
Concept Memo on
Inter-Aquifer or Surface Water Transfer
Unfortunately, the spatial location of human occupance doesn’t always overlap the geographic position where a body of water occurs naturally. How many times has it been said, “There is an ocean of good water just over there; if we could just get that water over here where it’s needed?” Cities large and small are fighting for water rights and to have access to a higher volume of water to support demands for growth. Water is at the crux of the growth war. The Central Texas region has many concerns: growth management, transportation, and escalating taxes to support the infrastructure and improvements people are demanding. But sustainable growth is dependent on sustainable water and that entails securing another resource for water. Without more water, we will not have sustainable growth; we cannot attract and accommodate new industry, local governmental services will continue to depend on tax revenues from existing businesses and homes and transportation issues cannot be addressed without more revenue or without raising taxes. The collective taxpaying citizens will have to bear the cost to improve a large scale supply of water to satisfy the demands of the masses.
Meeting the demands of growth must be solved by the collective taxpaying citizens in need of improving a large scale supply of water to be economically feasible. If the lines were in existence and the easements were already in place, a mechanism for transporting water would simplify moving water from a relatively undeveloped region with abundant water to a more urbanized area with diminishing water resources. Population statistics indicate the rural demands for water are diminishing as our culture becomes more urbanized. The aquifers were once needed for farming and ranching activities are now needed by the relocation of populace to the city.
Reservoirs are expensive to build and can be the target for protest by groups focused on maintaining an unaltered environment. But how can inter-aquifer or surface water transfers be accomplished economically over vast distances without a preexisting network? Discovering a viable means to move the water, utilizing new technology for the physical plant, the role of computer generated modeling, legislation of water law and other legal implications to the consumers and property owners including acquiring easements are several factors to be considered.
Running pipelines over vast distances has been promoted, but the expense prohibits it from becoming reality. Repurposing abandoned gas and oil pipelines modified to transport raw water to municipalities will alleviate the demands on the groundwater. This method will meet the needs of a community, save money in labor and materials, and environmental resources.
For any real progress in modifying existing pipelines, knowing the history of their origin and use is important. The following excerpt has been included from the online edition of Trenchless International.
The EPA will
invest $US10 million in the Aging Water Infrastructure Research
Program to evaluate new technologies that will assist utilities in
coping with aging and failing water and wastewater systems in the
United States.
Undertaken by the US Water Environment Research Foundation,
research efforts will examine innovative tools and procedures to
improve the maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of the
aging sewer lines, water mains, and other components that constitute
water and wastewater infrastructure in a cost effective manner.
Research efforts will focus on four key areas:
·
Condition
assessment for water and wastewater conveyance systems
·
System
rehabilitation for water and wastewater conveyance systems
·
Advanced
design and engineering concepts
·
Innovative
treatment technologies for wastewater, stormwater, water reuse and
drinking water.
Executive Director of WERF Glenn Reinhardt said “The
innovative tools and cost-effective solutions that will be developed
through this research should provide some welcomed assistance in
their ongoing efforts to serve the public and improve water
quality.”
The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Aging Water
Infrastructure Research Program is a research agenda that supports
efforts to put aging infrastructure in the US on a pathway towards
sustainability.
The research program was established by the EPA in 2009
following a study undertaken by the American Society of Civil
Engineers which graded the US wastewater and drinking water
infrastructure as a D minus. The analysis prompted President Barack
Obama to invest $US6 million in the nation’s water and wastewater
networks.
“Much of our water infrastructure is approaching the end of
its useful life,” said Thomas Speth, Director of the National Risk
Management Research Laboratory's Water Supply and Water Resources
Division.
“Working co-operatively with the water utility industry and
researchers from within EPA and universities will help identify a
new generation of technologies to determine the condition of the
pipes, improve rehabilitation techniques, and optimise replacement
schedules,” Mr Speth said
(February 2010,
http://trenchlessinternational.com/news).
Water
systems have been supplying individual families with water for
centuries through a maze of assorted materials.
Ancient civilizations carried water through aquaducts and
systems made from natural stone, clay and lead.
Inadequate supply even then became a burden to overcome as
population and growth increased.
It has not been uncommon for smaller water plants to
converge, interconnecting existing systems and users.
In 1824, the United States Army Corps of Engineers became the
nation’s water resources manager.
Planning became a designated responsibility in 1850.
It wasn’t until the 1960s that water resource planning began
to be considered. An
attempt was made to forecast the future needs and then formulate a
plan to deliver the water needed for growth.
However, for all of the positive planning undertaken, little
concern was given for regional planning.
Solving problems for one area carelessly omitted the impacts
caused for the surrounding region and how to supply the water
eventual growth would demand.
History
New
techniques in pipe rehabilitation were originally developed in
England to enhance the life of existing gas pipelines without
disrupting existing buildings.
Portland Utilities Construction Company has written a concise
history of who began pipe bursting leading to many other innovative
methods to extend the life of various types of underground
utilities.
The pipe bursting method was derived from the concepts found in pneumatic
piercing tools. These tools have been widely used since the 1960s.
In 1981, Contractors DJ Ryan and Sons LTD along with British Gas
(now Advantica Technologies) successfully ran a piercing tool
through an existing cast iron gas line in England and pipe bursting
was born.
At the time, there was a great deal of aging cast iron gas mains that
needed to be replaced. Being able to replace those lines without
open cutting narrow streets and sidewalks and possibly damaging
historic locations was very appealing. In addition, both the gas and
water markets in Europe were ripe for small diameter pipe bursting.
The basic idea behind pipe bursting is simple. During the process a
bursting tool is guided an existing fracturable pipe by a constant
tension winch. The tool is often equipped with an expander that is
larger than the existing or host pipe. As the tool travels through
the host pipe its percussive action effectively breaks apart the
pipe. The expander forces the fragments into the surrounding soil
while the new pipe is pulled in simultaneously.
The big push for pipe bursting in the U.S. began in the late 1980s and
early 1990s in the sewer market. Municipalities around the United
States have been looking for ways to mitigate Inflow and
Infiltration problems in their sanitary and storm sewer systems, in
order to meet environmental standards and optimize treatment
capacity levels.
Many improvement and advancements in pipe bursting equipment have taken
place since its initial development. Pipe bursting equipment design
specifically for lateral replacement is now available. In addition,
powerful static bursting equipment has made bursting ductile iron
and steel pipe possible.
http://www.pucc.org/basics/history.html
Pipe Rehabilitiation
Techniques
Repurposing existing mains is the basis for this theory to utilize infrastructure already in place but no longer in service. Cost is not the only savings this method embraces. The savings in time and environmental resources may outweigh the monetary benefits. Both slip lining and pipe bursting are cost effective in rehabilitating utility line infrastructure. Slip lining is a method of pulling new pipe through an existing pipe with little to minimal interruption. It creates a new interior preventing toxic leaching into the substance being carried and sealing leaks the original pipe may have developed. The slip lining process typically involves cleaning the original pipe of decay or deposits to open it for maximum flow. Pipe bursting uses the original pipe as a pig for a new, sometimes larger diameter pipe. The original pipe is burst open being absorbed into the immediate soil with a new pipe installed in its place also with little to minimal interruption to above ground. The following slip lining and pipe bursting contractors describe their techniques in either process.
Slip lining Contractors
Smart Pipe
Smart Pipe ® is a high strength, light weight,
monitored reinforced thermoplastic pipe that can be used for the
rehabilitation of an existing pipeline, or as a stand alone
replacement. The key feature of the technology that underlies Smart
Pipe ® is the use of ultra high strength fibers that are wrapped
onto a high density polyethylene core pipe. Through the selection of
the fibers, the lay angles, and their sizes, Smart Pipe ® can be
specially tailored for any given condition in terms of design
pressure, pull-in length (for a rehabilitation), and safe operating
duration. The exceptional strength/weight properties of various
ultra high strength fibers are provided in the following tabulation
for illustrative purposes.
It is designed and developed in accordance with the API Recommended
Practice 15S “Qualification of Spoolable Composite Pipe.”
It is simultaneously manufactured and installed
(using trenchless technology) as a tight fit liner in up to 50,000
feet of an underground pipeline without any disruption of the
surface areas covering the pipeline (except for a small opening at
the entry and exit points of the pipeline section being lined);
restores the subject pipeline to its full pressure service rating,
renews the projected service life of the subject pipeline to like
new or better than new condition, and in most cases does so without
diminishing the flow rates through the line despite the nominal
reduction in inside diameter of the pipeline that occurs due to the
presence of the liner; and provides the operator of the pipeline
with continuous monitoring and inspection features to assure safe
operation of the line throughout the renewed operating life of the
pipeline and to provide compliance with the regulations now emerging
under the various Pipeline Safety Acts.
http://www.smart-pipe.com
Oxford Plastics
Oxford Plastics manufactures heavy duty plastic pipe
for trenchless methods like
sliplining or
insertion renewal … to rehabilitate deteriorating pipe by
inserting a smaller pipe into an existing pipe. As a trenchless
method, sliplining can be applied to either pressure or gravity
pipelines. Water, sanitary and storm sewers can be renewed with
minimum excavation. When done properly, sliplining ensures that the
rehabilitated pipe and lateral connections are leak-tight, corrosion
resistant, and capable of even greater flow rates.
In the sliplining process, a winch cable is inserted
through the existing line and then attached to the front of the new
liner. The new liner pipe is then pulled into the existing pipe, and
the new liner pipe reconnected to the system. If needed, the void
between the new and old pipes can be filled by grouting.
Benefits:
Sliplining can be used on most types of pipe.
·
It is rapid and causes little disturbance to other utilities.
·
It works the best with few connections.
·
It improves hydraulic performance because of an improved friction
coefficient
·
It can be installed in live lines without bypass pumping.
Drawbacks:
·
When the new pipe is pulled into an existing pipe, there is a reduction
in the inside diameter which means a loss of cross-sectional
capacity. This limits the process to pipe sizes of 8 to 96 inches in
diameter.
·
Sliplining requires a long area of space for assembly.
·
There is an added cost of jointing techniques when limited to using short
pipe lengths.
·
Poorly applied grouting can lead to buckling.
·
Many excavations are required if there are too many service and branch
reconnections involved.
·
Sliplining does not work well in pipelines with a lot of elbows.
http://www.oxfordplasticsinc.com
American Pipe Lining
American Pipe Lining claims, “The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human
Services postulates that lead is the number one environmental threat
to our childrens' health, with increasing exposure rates caused by
the continued consumption of water from aging, corroded potable
water systems, many of which are still fitted with original
lead-based plumbing fixtures. American Pipe Lining's epoxy system
will provide a permanent protective barrier within the pipe halting
the further leaching of these and other harmful elements.”
The in-place pipe restoration process developed by American Pipe
lining, Inc. is an economical and efficient alternative to
traditional pipe system replacement. Our proprietary technology
allows us to restore aged, corroded piping systems in-place to a
"better than new" condition without the use of chemicals or
mechanical devices. The epoxy coating applied to the pipes'
interior, seal and protects the system from further deterioration
and dramatically extends system life. The process can be used on a
variety of pipe material including galvanized steel, cast/black
iron, copper and lead.
The American Pipe Lining method uses heated conditioned air to move
a non-toxic abrading agent through designated pipe runs and
segments. The movement of the agent through the pipe dislodges the
corrosion buildup and transports it to an exit opening in the pipe
where it is collected in a cyclonic grit unit and secondary dust
collection system. The waste corrosion product is non-toxic and
easily disposed of without any harm to the environment. The result
is a clean, rust-free polished surface inside the pipe. Following
pipe cleaning, a potable water safe,
NSF61- certified liquid epoxy is distributed
through the piping using heated controlled air flow to facilitate
optimal adhesion and curing. The coating will cure within 12-24
hours, after which time the system is re-assembled and returned to
service next day. The result is a smooth and durable finish
resistant to further corrosion and deterioration.
http://www.ampipelining.com/
A study was conducted in Korea for lining potable water pipes using
cured in place pipe rehabilitation effectively.
This is the process of tightly inserting a liner into an
existing pipe. It is
generally used for gravity flow pipes such as those used in sewer
and storm sewers. The pipeline should be cleaned by jetting to
remove loose dirt, debris or grease.
Calcite or other hard deposits can be removed by flailing,
reaming or robotic cutting.
The liner is inserted through pre-existing manholes or other
openings. The pipes may
be suitable for transporting potable water if the applied CIPP is
made from unsaturated polyester resin (ND-284) and a
polyethylene-felt tube.
Inserting the liner is achieved through a process of using
air pressure, water pressure or pulling the liner through using a
pig from one opening to the next.
Continuous pressure must be maintained through the
installation to assure a tight fit.
Hot water, steam or hot mist generated by an onsite boiler
unit is circulated within the liner to cause the tubes outer resin
to adhere to the existing pipe.
This has been found to be a reliable method in setting the
liner in ductile iron pipe previously used for potable water.
www.iattmed.com/pdf/s3_11_Myong.pdf.
Information has not confirmed the viability this method
could be used in pipes previously used for other purposes.
Pipe Bursting Contractors
Titan Technologies
The Grundocrack® is placed into the host pipe at an entry pit or manhole. A
constant tension Grundowinch®, based at the exit area pit and attached to the head of the
tool, guides it through the host pipe. Continuous percussion from
the pneumatic tool fractures the host pipe.
The Grundocrack effectively hammers its way through the host
pipe, displacing the fragments into the surrounding soil, while
simultaneously pulling the new pipe, usually High Density
Polyethylene (HDPE), into place behind it. (For more information on
HDPE pipe, visit ISCO Industries, LLC.) Pipebursting is the only
trenchless method of replacement that allows for the upsizing of the
original pipe.
The Grundowinch plays a key roll in pipebursting operations. The
constant tension, variable speed Grundowinch makes adjustments for
conditions that affect line speed during operation, providing
constant and consistent pulling force and preventing slack from
developing in the line. Twin capstans protect the cable and cable
drum from extreme stress levels. The Grundowinch essentially guides
the tool through the host pipe.
Several factors dictate whether pipebursting is appropriate for the
rehabilitation of a failed line. These considerations include host
pipe material, diameter, condition, depth, length, new pipe
diameter, soil conditions, peripheral utilities and service
connections. The Grundocrack can be used to burst fracturable pipes
(cast iron, clay, concrete, RCP, ABS and some plastics) with
diameters between 4 and 54 inches.
|
http://www.tttechnologies.com |
Oxford Plastics
Oxford Plastics manufactures heavy duty hdpe pipe
for trenchless methods like
pipe bursting. Pipe bursting is a relatively new trenchless
method which allows you to replace existing utility, water, gas and
sewer piping that is either worn out or incapable of meeting the
needs of a growing community.
Imagine being able to replace the entire water
supply and drainage system of a city without causing a major traffic
jam and incurring the enormous cost of restoring your streets and
roads. That is the promise of trenchless technologies like pipe
bursting.
The Piping Problem
No matter where you go, water, sewer, gas and other
utilities are in a constant state of deterioration or incapable of
meeting the rising needs of urban areas where population growth is a
problem. In most cases, water lines have become corroded to the
point where they are wasting water and incapable of meeting water
supply requirements. Gas lines are often made of cast-iron which not
only leaks, but is incapable of handling higher capacity or pressure
requirements. Because they transport aggressive and corrosive
material, most sewer lines are often cracked or corroded to the
point that they cannot transport the waste material without
stoppages and leaking into the environment. The biggest problem is
that most of these pipelines are located in overcrowded cities,
under buildings, roadways, rivers where replacement by traditional
open-trench methods is not a plausible option.
A Piping Solution
Pipe bursting represents the ideal pipe
rehabilitation solution for replacing and upsizing the capacity of
existing pipelines while avoiding the economic and social costs of
traditional methods. Pipe bursting is the only trenchless process
that enables a city to revitalize its piping system without
extensive excavation and traffic stoppages.
The Pipe Bursting Process
Pipe bursting involves using a winch to pull a heavy
duty polyethylene pipe through an old pipeline of equal or smaller
size. The old pipeline is shattered using a high-powered tool with
special bursting heads that smash through the old pipe while pulling
through the new replacement pipe. When pulled into the old pipe, the
bursting head breaks the pipe into pieces, enlarges the hole and
pushes the fragments into the surrounding soil. This limits pipe
bursting to pipes that can be fractured and to soil conditions that
will absorb the old fragments.
Developed for the natural gas industry in the late
1970s, pipe bursting has found new applications in the municipal
area for replacement of watermains and gravity sewers. Recent
advances in bursting head technology has produced three kinds of
pipe bursting technology each of which uses a different bursting
head: hydraulic,
pneumatic or
cone
cracking. While the range of pipe size and length is constantly
increasing, pipe rehabilitation projects have involved pipe
diameters of 3" to as much as 30" and straight pulls of HDPE pipe as
long as 1500 feet. As pipe bursting technology advances, different
types of pipe material can be replaced. At the moment, pipe
materials include vitrified clay pipe, asbestos cement pipe, truss
pipe, reinforced and unreinforced concrete pipe, and cast iron pipe.
Advantages of Pipe Bursting
As a "no-dig process", pipe bursting is the perfect solution for a
municipality looking to increase the capacity of its water supply
pipes or to replace corroded and leaking sewer pipes. All of this is
possible without extensive excavation and all the other costs of
surface restoration. Because its trenchless, pipe bursting is the
preferred method for replacing old pipes in urban areas where
disruption to surrounding utilities, local residences, businesses
and the environment are a consideration. An added benefit of using
hdpe plastic pipe for pipe bursting is its suitability for
non-pressure applications like sewer lines. Because of its smooth
inner walls, hdpe pipe assures high gravity flow rates and minimizes
the chances of developing stoppages.
Applications of HDPE Pressure Pipe
Our hdpe pressure pipe was manufactured for a wide range of
industrial, commercial and residential applications. Our broad
experience with industries from construction and waste to
agriculture and mining, has helped us to develop
pressure pipe and
piping systems that can operate under great pressure
and in very corrosive environments. This makes our pipe well suited
for use as watermain, landfill collection pipe, drainage pipe in
highway construction, agriculture, mining, and irrigation
industries, and as industrial transfer pipe for abrasive materials.
The physical toughness of this pipe, when combined with its light
weight and flexibility, makes it perfect for those situations where
trenchless technologies are required.
http://www.oxfordplasticsinc.com
Easements and Condemnation
Most pipelines have an existing easement permitting use and
accessibility. A legal
change in the ownership and use from oil or gas to pure water would
be required. However, a
modification from a toxic substance to water should not be protested
by the property owners who will benefit from the water after owning
the property with no protest of the lines with their former
transmission. Some
property owners have found the line was abandoned, and vacated the
easement or had the line removed completely.
In this case, a condemnation may be required to reinstall a
section of line or find an alternate route for connection between
two points.
Best Practices and Cost Analysis
Many good examples and testimonials are presented on
individual websites by the companies offering these services.
The following four case studies have been selected to give a
slightly different perspective on the benefits of rehabilitating
utility lines and or the cost comparison of rehabilitating lines.
Case Study 1:
The City of Atlanta’s Water Main Replacement Program
is designed to replace and rehabilitate aged and deteriorating water
mains throughout the city. Many of the pipes in the system were
installed in the early 1900s and are small in comparison to modern
standards in water mains. The small size and age of the pipes,
coupled with corrosion and sediment accumulation over the years, has
affected the flow rate and quality of water in some Atlanta
communities.
Since the program began in 2003, pipe replacement
and rehabilitation has been completed in the Garden Hills community
in Buckhead and the Capitol View community in southwest Atlanta.
Replacement work is currently in progress on Spring Street in
Georgia Tech’s Technology Square district and is scheduled for
Virginia-Highland and the Midtown area in 2005 and 2006
respectively. Water main replacement work will also be included in
the sewer separation projects that will take place in the
Greensferry, McDaniel and Stockade sewer basins. neighbors. The
Water Main Replacement Program is a part of the Clean Water Atlanta
infrastructure program to provide clean, safe water to residents and
downstream neighbors.
Over a 12 year period, the City of Atlanta will
inspect, repair and where necessary, replace every foot of the 2,200
miles of sanitary sewers. This unprecedented $1.2 billion project is
an integral part of the City’s comprehensive efforts to meet and
surpass all federal and state water quality standards.
The successful completion of the Clean Water Atlanta
projects will benefit Atlanta’s citizens and ratepayers, and our
neighbors downstream and throughout the region by providing the
infrastructure necessary to improve water quality and sustain
Atlanta’s economic vitality.
The SSES project is the first step in bringing
Atlanta’s aging sewer system up to world class/modern-day standards
and protecting Atlanta ratepayers’ quality of life by eliminating
Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs). Through the efforts of the SSES,
approximately 60,000 manholes and 2,200 miles of sanitary sewers
will be inspected for cracks, collapses, and blockages. After
extensive investigation and documentation of defects is completed, a
rehabilitation plan will be developed, identifying necessary sewer
repairs and replacement. In severe situations, immediate repair may
be required.
http://www.cleanwateratlanta.org/SewerRehab/technology/pipeburst.htm;
http://www.atlantawatershed.org/watrmain/watermain.htm
Case Study 2:
The cost to the Town of Highland Park for clearing the easements,
installing the new main with all appurtenances, grading and sodding
was $103 per foot. This represented a savings of nearly 30 percent
over previous open cut replacement in a similar area.The project was
completed successfully on the anticipated schedule, at a lower cost
per foot than previous open cut projects, and with minimal
disruption to the residents. Replacement of cast iron water lines
can be accomplished using pipe bursting techniques. In areas of
limited access, pipe bursting not only provides a replacement
solution with minimal disruption to residents, but is a cost
effective alternative to traditional open cut installation.
http://www.rjn.com/PDFs_publications/PipeBurstingWaterlines.PDF
Case Study 3:
Open cut method of pipe installation by a city “crew was estimated
at $32.00/ft with main at 6 feet deep in an unpaved alley.
Increased depth increases cost proportionately due to labor
and backfill material cost.” Conversely,
“pipe bursting with City of Brownwood crews estimated average is
$19.25/ft for all materials, labor and fuel.”
If using an open cut method across private property is
considered, the cost will be much greater to obtain easements and
may not be attainable due to existing improvements.
http://www.tml.org/2009TMUA/HarrisPipeBursting.pdf
Case Study 4:
Based on its past success with pipe
bursting, ALMU decided to go with
this method for this particular project, replacing the vitrified
clay pipe with HDPE. A small
section of 10-in. PVC installed a few years ago would also be
pipe bursted using the HDPE, as
ALMU wanted to upsize the pipe
diameter to 12 in. Auger boring would be used to cross 70 ft under a
state highway, which carries a high volume of traffic.
The diameter of the original vitrified clay
pipe was 10, 12, 15 and 18 in.;
ALMU upgraded the lines using 10-, 12- and 14-in. HDPE. Gaydar says
ALMU chose HDPE for the project because “it would provide a smoother
area for the flow, as compared to the joints in a vitrified clay
system.” “We did a pipe
bursting project in 2006 and our
bid price was half the cost
compared to open-cut,” explains ALMU engineering services manager
Jack Gaydar, P.S., P.E. “That’s why we are a proponent of trenchless
technology. It’s a major cost
factor in infrastructure rehabilitation. We need to be very
cost-conscious with our ratepayers’
money and ensure that we get a quality product that is going to last
for 100 years. Trenchless technology allows us to do that.”
Total cost for the trenchless and
open-cut work on the project was $1.473 million.
http://www.trenchlessonline.com/index/webapp-stories-action?id=668
Conclusion
While converting the use from oil and gas transmission to water
transmission with the new trenchless technology has never been
introduced to the market, studies indicate potable water can be
delivered by either lining the existing pipe or using the existing
pipe as a conduit for laying new, highly impenetrable pipe to carry
the water across vast distances.
The technology available today allows us to accommodate
growth and development with earth conscious innovation.
Instead of congested urban areas drawing down aquifer levels;
the sparsely populated, hinterlands with dwindling agricultural
demands can transmit any excess water via repurposed pipelines.
Whether for supplemental purposes or to fully satisfy the
aqueous demands, the pipeline is the future key to meeting water
transmission problems we have in Texas.
Bibliography
http://www.ellingsoncompanies.com, 2011
Microbial Quality of Water Supply in Distribution Systems, 1996,
Geldreich, Edwin E.
St. Mary's L.J. 1 (1986-1987) The Historical Background of Texas
Water Law - A Tribute to Jack Pope; Baade, Hans W.
Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Infrastructure Management, Neil S.
Grigg
©
Copyright 2010 Peggy Jones; Reproduction prohibited without express
written permission.
Pipe Bursting Demonstration - Warrior Worldwide Trenchless Solutions
Trenchless Replacement Specialist pipe bursting Odessa TX
